Difference between Soap and Rest

There are currently two schools of thought in developing Web Services – one being the standards-based traditional approach [ SOAP ] and the other, simpler school of thought [ REST ].

This article quickly compares one with the other -

REST	SOAP
Assumes a point-to-point communication model–not usable for distributed computing environment where message may go through one or more intermediaries	Designed to handle distributed computing environments
Minimal tooling/middleware is necessary. Only HTTP support is required	Requires significant tooling/middleware support
URL typically references the resource being accessed/deleted/updated	The content of the message typically decides the operation e.g. doc-literal services
Not reliable – HTTP DELETE can return OK status even if a resource is not deleted	Reliable
Formal description standards not in widespread use. WSDL 1.2, WADL are candidates.	Well defined mechanism for describing the interface e.g. WSDL+XSD, WS-Policy
Better suited for point-to-point or where the intermediary does not play a significant role	Well suited for intermediated services
No constraints on the payload	Payload must comply with the SOAP schema
Only the most well established standards apply e.g. HTTP, SSL. No established standards for other aspects.  DELETE and PUT methods often disabled by firewalls, leads to security complexity.	A large number of supporting standards for security, reliability, transactions.
Built-in error handling (faults)	No error handling
Tied to the HTTP transport model	Both SMTP and HTTP are valid application layer protocols used asTransport for SOAP
Less verbose	More verbose